Corporate Carbon Transparency in the EU: The Transformative Role of IFRS Sustainability Standards in Auditing and Reporting (2025)
Main Article Content
Abstract
This study investigates the transformative impact of IFRS Sustainability Disclosure Standards (S1/S2) on corporate carbon transparency within the European Union's evolving regulatory framework. Against the backdrop of the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD), we analyze the effectiveness of these standards in addressing critical gaps in carbon disclosure assurance, particularly for Scope 3 emissions. Employing a mixed-methods approach, we combine quantitative analysis of 50 EU firms' sustainability reports (2024-2025) with qualitative insights from 22 key stakeholders, including auditors, policymakers, and corporate leaders. Our findings reveal significant sectoral disparities in compliance, with only 28% of firms achieving full Scope 3 reporting and high-emission sectors underreporting by 25% (p < 0.1). The research demonstrates the crucial role of audit quality, as Big 4-audited reports showed 38% higher reliability (p < 0.01), despite 35% of auditors lacking adequate IFRS S2 expertise. Notably, our analysis shows CSRD's policy bundling approach (combining reporting mandates with assurance requirements) proved 2.6 times more effective than standalone carbon pricing measures (β = 0.47 vs. 0.18). These results underscore the need for sector-specific materiality thresholds, enhanced auditor training, and greater global harmonization of sustainability standards to support the EU's transition to net-zero emissions by 2050. The study contributes to ongoing debates about environmental accountability while offering practical insights for policymakers, corporations, and standard-setters navigating the complexities of carbon transparency.
Metrics
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
- Ambec, S., Cohen, M. A., Elgie, S., & Lanoie, P. (2013). The Porter hypothesis at 20: Can environmental regulation enhance innovation and competitiveness? Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 7(1), 2-22. https://doi.org/10.1093/reep/res016
- Bebbington, J., Unerman, J., & O'Dwyer, B. (2022). Sustainability accounting and accountability (3rd ed.). Routledge.
- Busco, C., Consolandi, C., Eccles, R. G., & Sofra, E. (2020). A preliminary analysis of SASB reporting: Disclosure topics, financial relevance, and the financial intensity of ESG materiality. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 32(2), 117-132. https://doi.org/10.1111/jacf.12407
- CDP. (2025). Global supply chain report 2025: The cost of carbon transparency. CDP Worldwide.
- Deloitte. (2024). IFRS sustainability standards: Implementation challenges across industries. Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited.
- DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147-160. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095101
- Eccles, R. G., & Serafeim, G. (2013). The performance frontier: Innovating for a sustainable strategy. Harvard Business Review, 91(5), 50-60.
- EFRAG. (2025). Interoperability of IFRS S2 and European Sustainability Reporting Standards. European Financial Reporting Advisory Group.
- European Commission. (2025). Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive implementation review. Directorate-General for Financial Stability, Financial Services and Capital Markets Union.
- Gray, R., Adams, C. A., & Owen, D. (2024). Accountability, social responsibility and sustainability: Accounting for society and environment. Pearson.
- Huang, X., Watson, L., & Zhang, Y. (2023). Scope 3 carbon emissions reporting: Challenges and best practices. Journal of Cleaner Production, 415, 137-152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.137812
- IFRS Foundation. (2025). IFRS S1 and S2 implementation guide: Global adoption trends. International Sustainability Standards Board.
- KPMG. (2025). The state of carbon assurance: Global audit practices under IFRS S2. KPMG International.
- Lyon, T. P., & Montgomery, A. W. (2015). The means and end of greenwash. Organization & Environment, 28(2), 223-249. https://doi.org/10.1177/1086026615575332
- Nordhaus, W. (2024). The climate club: How to fix a failing global effort. Foreign Affairs, 103(2), 10-18.
- OECD. (2025). Carbon pricing effectiveness database 2025. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/cpdb-2025-en
- Perego, P., & Kolk, A. (2023). Multinationals' accountability on sustainability: The evolution of third-party assurance of sustainability reports. Journal of Business Ethics, 184(3), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-023-05445-6
- Stechemesser, K., & Guenther, E. (2012). Carbon accounting: A systematic literature review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 36, 17-38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.02.021
- Wiedmann, T., Chen, G., & Barrett, J. (2023). The concept of city carbon maps: A case study of Melbourne, Australia. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 27(1), 42-56. https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.13345