From Checklists to Algorithms: Historical Trajectories and the Transformative Role of Artificial Intelligence in Auditing

Main Article Content

Aysha N. AlSalih

Abstract

This conceptual study explores the historical evolution of auditing and evaluates the disruptive potential of artificial intelligence (AI) in reshaping core audit structures. Using institutional theory and models of technological disruption, it maps critical phases in audit development and identifies AI's impact across five domains: audit quality, efficiency, ethics, governance, and regulatory responsiveness. The study formulates theoretical propositions to clarify both opportunities and risks of AI integration. Findings suggest a historical pattern of reactive adaptation in auditing, with implications for ethics and competence development. The research offers practical and regulatory guidance and contributes original insights into the intersection of AI and Shariah-compliant audit systems.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Article Details

How to Cite
Aysha N. AlSalih. (2025). From Checklists to Algorithms: Historical Trajectories and the Transformative Role of Artificial Intelligence in Auditing. IJEP, 8(02), Pages : 31–45. https://doi.org/10.54241/2065-008-002-003
Section
Articles
Author Biography

Aysha N. AlSalih, Department of Accounting, College of Business Administration, Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University,

Researcher at

Department of Accounting, College of Business Administration,

Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University,

References

 Appelbaum, D., Kogan, A., & Vasarhelyi, M. A. (2017). Big data and analytics in the modern audit engagement: Research needs. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 36(4), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.2308/ajpt-51684

 Austin, A. A., Carpenter, T. D., Christ, M. H., & Nolder, C. J. (2021). The data analytics transformation: Evidence from auditors, CFOs, and standard setters. Accounting Horizons, 35(4), 111–135.

 Byrnes, P., Al-Awadhi, A., & Gullkvist, B. (2021). Audit education in the age of AI: Challenges and opportunities. Journal of Accounting Education, 56, 100754.

 Byrnes, P., Mertins, K., & Vasarhelyi, M. A. (2021). Artificial intelligence and the audit profession: New skills for new roles. Journal of Emerging Technologies in Accounting, 18(1), 35–52. https://doi.org/10.2308/jeta-18-01-04

 Carcello, J. V., Hermanson, D. R., & Ye, Z. (2011). Corporate governance research in accounting and auditing: Insights, practice implications, and future research directions. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 30(3), 1–31.

 Carnegie, G. D., & Napier, C. J. (1996). Critical and interpretive histories: Insights into accounting’s present and future through its past. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 9(3), 7–39.

 Chandler, A. D. (1977). The visible hand: The managerial revolution in American business. Harvard University Press.

 Christensen, C. M. (1997). The innovator’s dilemma: When new technologies cause great firms to fail. Harvard Business School Press.

 DeFranco, G., Kausar, A., & Zerni, M. (2011). Audit quality: Insights from the academic literature. Audit Committee Institute.

 Dillard, J. F., & Vinnari, E. (2019). Critical accounting research: A limited humanism? Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 32(3), 753–776. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-06-2018-3545

 DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–160.

 Dowling, C. (2009). Appropriate audit support system use: The influence of auditor, audit team, and firm factors. The Accounting Review, 84(3), 771–810.

 Eilifsen, A., Knechel, W. R., & Wallage, P. (2020). Auditing and assurance services: An integrated approach. Routledge.

 Humphrey, C. (2008). Auditing research: A review across the disciplinary divide. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 21(2), 170–203.

 Humphrey, C. (2008). Auditing research: A review across the disciplinary divide. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 33(4-5), 446–452. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2007.06.007

 Humphrey, C., & Gendron, Y. (2015). What is going on? The sustainability of accounting academia. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 26, 47–66.

 Issa, H., Sun, T., & Vasarhelyi, M. A. (2016). Research ideas for artificial intelligence in auditing: The formalization of audit and workforce supplementation. Journal of Emerging Technologies in Accounting, 13(2), 1–20.

 Kaplan, R. S. (2011). Accounting scholarship that advances professional knowledge and practice. The Accounting Review, 86(2), 367–383. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-10069

 Knechel, W. R., & Sharma, D. S. (2012). Auditor-provided nonaudit services and audit effectiveness and efficiency: Evidence from pre- and post-SOX eras. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 31(4), 85–114.

 Kokina, J., & Davenport, T. H. (2017). The emergence of artificial intelligence: How automation is changing auditing. Journal of Emerging Technologies in Accounting, 14(1), 115–122.

 Krahel, J. P., & Vasarhelyi, M. A. (2014). Big data in accounting: An overview. Accounting Horizons, 28(2), 275–295. https://doi.org/10.2308/acch-50622

 Liu, Q., Appelbaum, D., & Lin, Z. (2022). Artificial intelligence in auditing: Evolution, ethics, and future directions. Accounting Horizons, 36(3), 71–95.

 Liu, Q., Wang, K., & Vasarhelyi, M. A. (2022). The impact of artificial intelligence on auditing: A review and research agenda. Journal of Information Systems, 36(3), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.2308/isys-2022-004

 Lukka, K., & Modell, S. (2010). Validation in interpretive management accounting research. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 35(4), 462–477.

 MacInnis, D. J. (2011). A framework for conceptual contributions in marketing. Journal of Marketing, 75(4), 136–154.

 Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83(2), 340–363.

 Power, M. (1997). The audit society: Rituals of verification. Oxford University Press.

 Rozario, A. M., & Vasarhelyi, M. A. (2018). How automation is changing audit. Journal of Emerging Technologies in Accounting, 15(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.2308/jeta-51942

 Sandberg, J., & Alvesson, M. (2021). Meanings of theory: Clarifying theory through typification. Journal of Management Studies, 58(2), 487–516.

 Suddaby, R. (2010). Editor’s comments: Construct clarity in theories of management and organization. Academy of Management Review, 35(3), 346–357.

 Walker, S. P. (2008). Accounting, critical theory and religion: A reflective essay. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 21(8), 1115–1135.

 Walker, S. P. (2015). Accounting and preserving the American dream. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 34, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2015.01.001

 Westermann, K. D., Cohen, J. R., & Trompeter, G. M. (2020). How data analytics affects audit judgment: Insights from auditors in a setting of group judgment. Contemporary Accounting Research, 37(2), 1331–1363. https://doi.org/10.1111/1911-3846.12554

 Whetten, D. A. (1989). What constitutes a theoretical contribution? Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 490–495.

 Yoon, K., Hoogduin, L., & Zhang, L. (2015). Big data as complementary audit evidence. Accounting Horizons, 29(2), 431–438. https://doi.org/10.2308/acch-51068